Voted for the fourth consecutive year Fifa Ballon d’Or Lionel Messi was not alone in the race. Should Andres Iniesta or Cristiano Ronaldo have won it? Leave your opinion in the comments section below the article.
The film of the year is not necessarily the one who wins the Oscar. Is it the same for Lionel Messi named Ballon d’Or on Monday for the fourth consecutive time at only 25 years old? Although the Argentinian is the best dribbler in the world and the new recordman of most goals scored in a year – 91 and whilst it is nice to see him play, he is humble indeed, but what did he win in 2012? The King’s Cup with FC Barcelona…
Neither the Liga or the Champions League. Is it really enough to be crowned best player of the year? Especially as his detractors accuse him of not always performing with the Argentine national team …
Who then? Real Madrid won La Liga title which is way more prestigious than the King’s Cup, which would make Cristiano Ronaldo a winner. Or rather Andres Iniesta: Messi’s teammate was named best player of the finals of Euro won against Italy in July and best player of the tournament. In addition, it fulfills all the criteria of humility that is attributed to Messi. Finally, the Spaniard was elected in December European player of the year by UEFA before … Messi and Ronaldo.
In the chorus of praise acknowledging the fourth Ballon d’Or Lionel Messi, you have the right not to agree. Should it have been Ronaldo or Iniesta? Express yourself in the comments below.
Pingback: Ballon d'Or- How could they forget Pirlo? | Football Deluxe()
Pingback: Messi and Ronaldo teasing each other via SMS | Football Deluxe()
Pingback: Ballon d'Or:Ibrahimovic criticizes Ronaldo | Football Deluxe()
Pingback: Iniesta or Ronaldo deserve the Ballon d'Or more than Messi, claims Wenger | Football Deluxe()
Pingback: scam web hosting()
Pingback: 12bet()
Pingback: stryker hip recall()
Pingback: hus til salgs i tyrkia()